The mRNA Vaccine

 I have had several encounters with friends who think I should not share information concerning the mRNA vaccine's adverse reactions. This week I had another "vaccine encounter" with a friend. He and others feel I should not share information about immunization without vetting my source and their research training. Since I am not a medical doctor and have no scientific knowledge, I should accept what science tells me. I agree I am not trained in scientific research and do not have medical training. That is why I rely on those who do not have a financial interest in selling the vaccine and are researchers and doctors. So I deal in data supplied by those who question the use of mRNA vaccines.

 Two former Pfizer scientists who went to court in Europe trying to stop the trials can attest to the dangers of mRNA vaccine, as do other highly qualified scientists. Medical doctors have been warning the general public has no idea if the new mRNA vaccine will be effective or safe because "absolutely no long-term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don't cause cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines.

And with all the uncritical, corrupt spin from the global media about how the mRNA vaccines will "save us from the virus" (SARS-Cov2), Pfizer has snuck its COVID vaccine into the government-subsidized marketplace under the guise of preventing death. Keep in mind Pfizer has major convictions for dishonesty and fraud.

According to the Department of Justice Website https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history

WASHINGTON – American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together "Pfizer") have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today.

Pharmacia & Upjohn Company has agreed to plead guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for misbranding Bextra with the intent to defraud or mislead. Bextra is an anti-inflammatory drug that Pfizer pulled from the market in 2005. Under the provisions of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, a company must specify the intended uses of a product in its new drug application to the FDA. Once approved, the drug may not be marketed or promoted for so-called "off-label" uses – i.e., any use not specified in an application and approved by FDA. Pfizer promoted the sale of Bextra for several uses and dosages that the FDA specifically declined to approve due to safety concerns. The company will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States for any matter. Pharmacia & Upjohn will also forfeit $105 million for a total criminal resolution of $1.3 billion.

My discussion with a retired scientist told me that mRNA was safe and that I should take the shot. My concern is it would change my genetics. I was told that mRNA did not change your genetics. Here is what I have found from other scientists who have years of experience with mRNA. I discovered that mRNA vaccines — also called "genetic vaccines" — arise from an innovative biotechnology approach that turns the body's cells into molecular factories to produce proteins that activate a pathogen-specific immune response. 

Research into mRNA vaccines is still in its infancy, even though various biotech pioneers have been working on achieving mRNA vaccines for around two decades. Yet, more decades of research will likely be required to achieve acceptable safety and efficacy levels. I find it interesting that I am asked to have faith in a process that has not been proven successful in two decades.

The profit-motivated rush to deploy mRNA vaccines to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus is causing regulators and researchers to skip (or accelerate) many critical steps in quality control and clinical trials. This is likely to result in catastrophic consequences — unintended side effects — of such vaccines are granted approval for widespread deployment without proper long-term clinical trials.

With mRNA vaccines, what's injected into the body isn't a weakened virus or even selected antigens but rather protein-coding instructions that tell your body's cells how to make the antigens on their own. (That process is called "translation.") Sounds safe, but they also present enormous risks, and if the deployment of mRNA vaccines is rushed, the results could be catastrophic. Additionally, mRNA vaccines can be maliciously deployed to deliberately trick the human body into attacking its own critical functions such as fertility, neurological function, cell repair and other vital processes, and even death.

Pfizer presents the deaths in its trial as a mere 0.01% of the 43,459 involved. Of the two who took the vaccine and died, one had a heart attack 62 days after being vaccinated, and the other "died from arteriosclerosis three days after vaccination." Pfizer's ho-hum spin on the deaths was that they "represent events that occur in the general population of the age groups where they occurred, at a similar rate." How very convenient.

But that information alone should serve as one big hint for people with any heart condition – don't take the COVID shots! Vaccines shock the immune system, which often results in neurological reactions and damage like autism in children or short-term side effects like convulsions or facial paralysis, which trial participants have suffered.

You might well survive with mild reactions, or you might not. Vaccines are a death and injury lottery but with much lower odds than your regular lottery ticket. The common claim is that such deaths and adverse reactions are "one in a million." Statistically, they are much higher. The Vaccine Adverse Reporting System (VAERS) in the U.S. reveals 40-50,000 adverse events voluntarily reported annually. But VAERS says those reports are as low as 1% of the actual adverse events. The deaths of infants that occur post-vaccination are also often reported as "SIDS."

The ex-Pfizer scientists who have safety concerns about the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine are the former head of respiratory research, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and the public health department's former head, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg. They recently filed a petition for a stay of action asking the European Medicine Agency to suspend phase III of the clinical trials and all other clinical trials. Why would they be concerned if it was safe?

A recent data dump from the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a U.S. Government-funded database that tracks injuries and deaths caused by vaccines, reports the vaccine's adverse effect. Cdc 329 Recorded Deaths So Far Following Experimental Covid Mrna Injections In The U.S. The data goes through January 22, 2021, with 9,845 recorded adverse events, including 329 deaths following injections of the experimental COVID mRNA shots by Pfizer and Moderna. Over 50% of the deaths are among those over the age of 75. That's an average of over 160 deaths a week so far. How many more deaths will still be recorded during that period?

Here is what I have found in my research of the mRNA vaccine.

The big problem with mRNA vaccines is that human biochemistry is incredibly complex. The body's synthesis of tens of thousands of different proteins is remarkably delicate and easy to throw out of balance. Many people don't realize this, but proteins are not merely structural components of the body (such as muscle tissue). They are also messengers (such as hormones), transport vehicles, enzymes, antibodies, and many other types of molecules necessary for good health.

Injecting the body with mRNA strands — which are essentially protein synthesis instructions — could theoretically unleash catastrophic unintended consequences in the body, including causing destructive self-reinforcing feedback loops that either diminish necessary protein synthesis or cause runaway excessive protein synthesis. These side effects can potentially lead to at least five adverse outcomes:

1) Sudden onset of autoimmune disorders that cause the body's immune system to attack its own cells. 

2) Heightened inflammation in the body, resulting in a hyper-inflammatory response in some people, leading to secondary effects such as neurological damage, organ failure, or cancer. This is also sometimes called an "enhanced" inflammatory response.

3) A heightened risk of blood clotting in response to mRNA strands circulating in the blood outside the body's cells. This can lead to potentially fatal episodes of stroke or serious cardiovascular events.

4) Immune response interference due to the presence of unintended RNA fragments being translated into unintended proteins, leading to a vast array of possible adverse outcomes, including molecular deficiencies that can result in various diseases and syndromes, including hormonal/endocrine disorders, infertility, cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders and many more.

5) In the case of self-replicating mRNA vaccines using viral components, an inability to stop a runaway process that's replicating out of control in the body. This could theoretically occur when the mRNA snippets are pushed into cells via virus replicon particles (VRP), for example, or using other viral delivery methods that rely on viral replication machinery. On the other hand, self-replicating mRNA vaccines allow for injection doses to be minimal. The mRNA coding material is self-replicating, leading to safer vaccines with far smaller dosing requirements than traditional vaccines.

In addition to these significant risks, there are also enormously important questions about mRNA vaccines and some of the problems they might encounter in the body:

1) What happens if the desired protein folding goes awry? 

2) How do the antigens produced inside the cell efficiently get transported to the cell's outer membrane? 

3) What happens if the mRNA snippets get fragmented, and only partial instructions are delivered to the ribosomes, resulting in partial protein translation? 

Notably, many of the theoretical side effects of an mRNA vaccine would not become apparent until months or years after the initial injection. These adverse events are likely to be systemic, not acute, and would not become evident in short-term clinical trials. This is a critical issue to grasp since mRNA vaccines are right now being rushed through short-term clinical trials, leaving open the possibility of long-term unintended side effects that vaccine manufacturers or FDA regulators did not anticipate.

Short of taking a course in the study of mRNA, I think (not believe since it will be construed as religious) I have a better understanding of the mRNA and its function in the body enough to say NO to the shot.