This week (Thursday, 5/6/2021), some in our church looked at the potential risk of taking the vaccine. We hear from Joe Biden and our governor, and the MSM is that the vaccine is safe. With all the information about the vaccine being spread around, you would think everyone would know the risk. The data is on the CDC site, the Big Pharma sites, and many medical doctors warn against the potential risk to both young and old. If you have not had your shot, you may be under pressure from friends, family, and doctor to get the jab. My doctor has been twisting my arm for the last two appointments to get the shot. Every day we hear someone in authority telling us to get the shot. But what are they not telling us?
Joe Boden wants to reach 70% by July 2021. There will be a lot of pressure for the unvaccinated to comply. There will come a time in the near months where it will become difficult not to be vaccinated. People are calling for "shunning" of the unvaccinated. Those wishing to travel will not fly on commercial airplanes or go to work, enter a business, receive medical treatment if they do not have the shot. People are not allowing the unvaccinated to attend family functions, weddings, or gathering with a group of friends. But before you run out and make the appointment to get the job, you should consider the potential risk.
I am sure you can recall that both Biden and Harris were against the same vaccine they took and now support during the Trump administration. When Trump was president, the vaccine was not safe or reliable. Now that Biden and Harris are in office, it is both safe and reliable.
"I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump" on the reliability of a vaccine. (Harris)
During the live debate in Salt Lake City, Harris said when she was asked if Americans should take a vaccine if the Trump administration were to approve one either before or after the election, her answer was, "But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it. I'm not taking it."
There are risks in everything, including in getting a vaccine. So why not rationally weigh the risk/reward ratio, as we do with every decision we make. One of the very few elected officials in the country who has said a word about any of this, who has asked the obvious questions, not attacking vaccines, wondering about their effects, is Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. Johnson asked Francis Collins, the NIH director, why so many Americans seem to be dying after the shot.
Maybe there's a good answer for that, and Collins wouldn't even acknowledge that was happening. Instead, Collins fretted if the population-focused too much on the harm from vaccines, people might be hesitant to get them. Some people don't want the vaccine. That's their right to refuse the shot. Period. Not all of us are crazy. Health decisions used to be considered personal choices. We didn't ask about them. They were deemed to be private as recently as last fall.
If American citizens are going to be forced to take this vaccine or any other medicine, we have an absolute right to know the effects it might have on our bodies. And we have a fundamental right to ask that question without being silenced or censored, or mocked. No amount of happy talk or coercion, or appeals to false patriotism can change that.
Check out the link below.
The 4/23/2021 release of VAERS data: Found 3,544 cases where vaccine targets COVID-19 (COVID19) and Patient Died. https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19&DIED=Yes
Only a small percentage of test subjects are reporting, which means these numbers are much higher than reported.
Here is a switch. There are those calling for the shunning of the unvaccinated, but it is unvaccinated people who are in danger of being infected by the vaccinated.
PFIZER'S DOCUMENTS STATE BOTH INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UNVACCINATED Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:
1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman or breathes any of the air she breathes (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event, and she should avoid having children.
2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have cognitive difficulties.
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
"An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people around the trial participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY."
TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super-spreaders of something. They don't say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people who never had the vax when exposed to people who did have the vax.
Maybe it is time for the unvaccinated to shun the vaccinated. During the beginning of the pandemic, churches were closed to stop the spread. Mask and social distance were required to be followed. Some people refused to return to church because not everyone wore a mask. That was their choice. Has the time come when the vaccinated should be asked to stay away from the unvaccinated?
I, along with others, believe it is time to stop the madness. We are giving up hard-fought rights and freedoms out of fear. As a nation, we forget that we have already long ago established fundamental human rights such as bodily autonomy, medical sovereignty (HIPPA), and informed voluntary consent. Informed consent to medical treatment is essential in both ethics and law. Patients have the right to receive information and ask questions about recommended treatments so that they can make well-considered decisions about care. Successful communication in the patient-physician relationship fosters trust and supports shared decision-making. Know the risk is part of the decision-making process.
The Nuremberg Code is a stark reminder we have been through this before and should not allow it to happen again. We must remember Who We Are and stop this insane COVID medical experimentation – before it's too late. The whole world is now witnessing the descent to a global state of manufactured madness, irrational fear, and extreme over-reaction being experienced by the vast majority of humanity. A highly organized strategy is implemented with extremely purposeful design by demonic powers and evil forces to destroy humanity. Satan is changing society to his design and purpose, and we need to resist him.
No comments:
Post a Comment