Delusional Christians: A Caution Against Modern Misinterpretations

For many years, I have viewed the theology of C. I. Scofield as hearsay shaped by his Zionist influences rather than by sound Biblical doctrine. Today, much of what passes for teaching about the return of the LORD is steeped in fantasy and speculation, replacing genuine Biblical truth with sensationalism. Many believers have forgotten how to rightly divide the Word of Truth, instead embracing interpretations that lack scriptural foundation.

A troubling trend has emerged within Evangelical circles: the belief that Israel can do no wrong and that Christians are obligated to approve all actions taken by modern-day Israel—even when those actions directly violate Christian principles. This uncritical support overlooks a crucial distinction: modern-day Israel is not synonymous with Old Testament Israel. God’s promise to revive Israel included all twelve tribes, not just the Jews—who are descendants of Judah.

During Jesus’ ministry, He confronted individuals who claimed Jewish identity but were not true descendants from Jacob’s line. In John chapter 4, Jesus identifies these so-called Jews as being from Esau’s lineage rather than Jacob’s; historically, many religious leaders at that time were Edomites—not Israelites by blood or promise.

As we navigate complex theological issues in our time, let us remain vigilant against teachings that distort scripture for political or ideological ends. We must return to careful study and discernment—rightly dividing truth from tradition—and resist any narrative that replaces genuine faith with delusion or misplaced loyalty.

When Faith Becomes a Tribal Marker

One of the most concerning trends among delusional Christians is the transformation of faith into a tribal badge. Instead of Jesus being Lord over all loyalties, His name becomes shorthand for “our side,” “our values,” or even “our nation.” This shift turns Christianity from a living, transforming faith into little more than a cultural identity marker. The danger here is subtle but real: when faith becomes just another label in the culture wars, it loses its power to challenge and change us—reducing the radical call of Christ to mere group membership.

Moral Language Gets Weaponized

Another troubling pattern emerges when moral and religious language is used as ammunition in political battles. Policies are framed as “biblical,” “God’s will for America,” or labeled as a matter of “Christian duty.” But politics is rarely so black-and-white; few issues fit neatly onto a single Bible verse. When complex debates are boiled down to simplistic spiritual slogans, thoughtful discussion gets shut down and discernment discouraged. This weaponization of moral language can leave believers feeling pressured to conform rather than encouraged to think deeply and prayerfully.

Emotional Trust Is Leveraged

For many Christians, the name of Jesus carries profound trust and reverence. Political movements that wrap themselves in that name can lower skepticism, making their rhetoric feel spiritually validated. Criticizing such movements may even be painted as blasphemy rather than honest policy disagreement. This dynamic gives enormous—and potentially dangerous—power to anyone willing to invoke Jesus’ authority for their own ends.

Jesus Gets Reduced

Perhaps most alarming is how easily Jesus’ teaching gets reduced when attached to partisan agendas. The heart of His message—humility, enemy-love, truthfulness, servanthood, care for the poor—is often overshadowed by political priorities: power plays, strategy sessions, coalition-building, compromise, and messaging warfare. When raw power politics co-opts Christ’s name, something vital about His character inevitably gets lost or distorted.

A truly healthy Christian approach to politics demands loyalty to Christ above any party line; it means critiquing our own side with honesty; distinguishing biblical principles from specific policy prescriptions; refusing to equate national identity with God’s kingdom; and always testing rhetoric by its fruit—in character, truthfulness, and love.

It must also be said: bringing Jesus into public life isn’t inherently wrong—faith should shape values—but there’s an urgent difference between genuine involvement and cynical co-opting. Let us not lose sight of what makes our faith truly transformative by reducing it to just another tool in earthly power struggles.

American Patriotism is Not Christianity

 As someone with deep American roots—my family, the Truitts, have called this country home since 1640—I understand the pride that comes from a strong heritage. My ancestor George Truitt was not only a friend of George Fox, the founder of Quakerism, but also a leading spirit among Quakers in colonial America. My lineage is woven into the fabric of this nation, from early settlements in Virginia to active civic involvement across generations. I have personally dedicated myself to public service and advocacy, lobbying both at our nation’s capital and within Indiana for issues close to my heart.

It is precisely because of this love for my country that I feel compelled to sound a note of caution: American patriotism and Christianity are not synonymous. Too often today, there is a dangerous tendency among some Christians to equate their faith with national identity—to believe that being American automatically means embodying Christian values or vice versa. This conflation can lead down a delusional path where spiritual convictions are distorted by political agendas.

When we allow our religious beliefs to be co-opted by nationalism—or when we claim divine favor for one nation over another—we risk losing sight of the true teachings of Christ: humility, compassion, justice for all people regardless of nationality. As history shows through figures like George Truitt and his Quaker contemporaries, faith should guide us toward peace and integrity—not blind allegiance or exclusionary rhetoric.

Let us remember that loving our country does not require distorting our faith. True Christianity calls us beyond borders and partisanship into deeper service for all humanity—a lesson as relevant now as it was in colonial times.

There are times when people—whether Christians or members of any religious group—accept ideas or messages too quickly simply because they use familiar language or invoke sacred names. The mention of “Jesus” can create instant trust, emotional connection, and an assumption of legitimacy. However, just because something sounds Christian doesn’t mean it truly reflects Christ’s teachings. This is a real and persistent concern.

Even in the Bible, Jesus Himself warned about such dangers. In Matthew 7:21–23, He spoke about people who would say “Lord, Lord,” yet not actually follow Him. He cautioned against false prophets who come in sheep’s clothing (Matthew 7:15), appearing trustworthy but leading others astray. The New Testament urges believers to “test the spirits” and examine teachings carefully before accepting them as truth.

Blind acceptance is not biblical Christianity—discernment is essential. It’s important to recognize that many American Christians do practice caution and deep discernment; however, cultural Christianity—using Christian language without genuine spiritual formation—can blur the lines between true faith and superficial claims. Media, politics, marketing campaigns, and even scams sometimes exploit religious language for influence or gain.

In a world where words can be manipulated so easily, followers of Christ must remain vigilant. Not everything done in Jesus’ name aligns with His heart or message. True discipleship requires careful examination—not just trusting what sounds right on the surface but seeking what genuinely reflects Christ’s love and truth at its core.

Am I My Brothers Keeper?

 For nearly two millennia, Christianity has been woven into the very fabric of the Middle East. Long before Europe embraced the faith, ancient churches flourished from Jerusalem to Damascus, Antioch to Mosul, and Alexandria. These communities bore witness to centuries of history—cradling traditions, languages, and cultures that shaped not only a region but the world itself.

Yet today, these storied Christian communities are disappearing at an alarming pace. Their decline is more than a footnote; it is a profound loss that reverberates far beyond church walls. War has ravaged homes and hearts. Islamist extremism has sown fear and division. Economic hardship and quiet discrimination have forced families to leave lands where Christianity was once native—lands where they had lived since the earliest days of the faith.

In country after country, populations of Christians have collapsed catastrophically. The result is not just demographic change—it’s the erasure of a moderating, pluralistic presence from one of humanity’s most volatile regions. This isn’t just a tragedy for Christians; it’s one for all who hope for peace and coexistence in the Middle East.

What makes this crisis even more concerning is how quietly it unfolds—largely unreported and met with indifference by much of the Christians in the West. Yet amidst this darkness shines an enduring light: stories of resilience, courage, and faith that refuse to be extinguished.

Endurance Through Adversity

The demographic collapse is stark. In Iraq, Christians made up 10% of the population as recently as one century ago. Today, they are well under 2%, numbering fewer than 300,000 in total. In Syria, the Christian population has fallen by more than half since 2011 – in the past 14 years alone. Lebanon was once a rare Christian-majority state in the region, but now sees its Christian share being eroded by emigration and demographic imbalance. Even in Egypt, home to the ancient Coptic Church, Christians face persistent discrimination, second-class legal status, and sporadic violence. Across the Middle East and North Africa, the trend is consistent: fewer Christians with less protection and more pressure to leave. At the start of WWI, Christians represented 20% of the region’s population. Today, it’s estimated to be less than 3%, with a decline from 3.3 to 2.9% being reported between 2010 and 2020 alone.

Yet within these sobering statistics lies an extraordinary story of endurance—a testament to faith that refuses to fade even when confronted with overwhelming odds. Throughout centuries of challenge and change, these communities have continued to nurture their traditions and uphold their values against all adversity.

Their presence may be diminished in number but not in spirit; every church bell that rings out across Baghdad or Cairo is a declaration that hope endures where history runs deep. Every family who chooses resilience over despair becomes part of an unbroken chain stretching back millennia—one that cannot be easily severed by mere numbers on a page.

Breaking the Silence: Confronting the Persecution of Middle Eastern Christians

Unlike other global causes, the persecution of Middle Eastern Christians rarely dominates Western media or international political agendas. Churches are bombed, villages are emptied, and communities are threatened – mostly without any proper coverage. This silence is not accidental. Part of the reason seems to be discomfort; acknowledging the systematic targeting of Christians disrupts “tidy” narratives about conflict, colonialism, and cultural relativism that often shape Western discourse.

Confronting this reality challenges us to face difficult questions about Islamist and Jewish violence, minority rights, and the boundaries of Western foreign policy. Yet remaining silent is not a neutral act—it is a form of acquiescence. When we look away from these injustices, we risk sending a message that suffering endured by one group matters less than another’s.

But inspiration can be drawn from truth-telling and advocacy. By raising our voices for those who cannot speak freely—by demanding honest coverage and compassionate action—we can help rewrite the narrative. The West has always prided itself on defending human rights; now is the time to extend that promise to persecuted Christian communities in the Middle East. Awareness is only the beginning; courage lies in refusing silence and standing up for justice, even when it challenges our comfort zones or established perspectives.

Bridging the Gap: Turning Commitments into Action for Middle Eastern Christians

Western governments routinely affirm their commitments to religious freedom and human rights, yet the lived reality for Christians in the Middle East tells a different story. The gap between words and deeds is not just disappointing—it’s a call to action for all who believe in justice and dignity.

Despite annual reports from the US and EU dedicated to religious freedom, meaningful mechanisms rarely translate into binding conditions on aid, trade, or diplomatic engagement. After ISIS was defeated in Iraq, Western funding largely focused on general reconstruction rather than targeted support for devastated Christian towns like Qaraqosh and Bartella. These communities remain vulnerable; militias intimidate returning Christians while Western governments defer to Baghdad instead of conditioning assistance on minority protection. Faced with insecurity and neglect, many Christians see permanent emigration as their only option.

In Syria, sanctions meant to pressure the government have also stifled reconstruction efforts—disproportionately harming minorities already struggling to survive. Christian leaders warn that these policies are accelerating emigration by making daily life unsustainable—a reality too often dismissed as collateral damage.

Egypt’s Coptic Christians face persistent discrimination: restrictions on church construction, uneven law enforcement after sectarian violence, and “reconciliation sessions” that pressure victims into dropping legal claims. Yet military cooperation and economic aid from Western powers continue with few strings attached regarding minority rights.

One group of Christians that has contributed to an increase in persecution is the Christian Zionists.

Understanding Dispensationalism: The Foundation of Christian Zionism

Let’s start with the idea of dispensationalism, which is key to the rise of Christian Zionism. What is it, and how does support for Israel factor into it? Dispensationalism is a system of theology that has inspired generations of conservative Protestants—Evangelicals and Fundamentalists alike—to read scripture through a unique lens. Its roots stretch back to the early 19th century, when John Nelson Darby broke away from the Church of England and formed the Plymouth Brethren sect. Darby’s fresh approach to interpreting the Bible led to a powerful new vision about God’s relationship with humanity.

According to dispensationalists, God has chosen two distinct peoples throughout history: Israel and the Church. This belief brings Old Testament prophecies alive for many, as every mention of Israel—whether in ancient prophetic books or in Revelation—is seen as referring directly to ethnic Israel, or what we call today the Jewish people.

The Church, on its part, carries a global mission: gathering Gentiles from every nation into fellowship with God. Yet dispensationalists believe this era will soon reach its climax. At any moment, they say, God could initiate “the Rapture,” whisking believers away to Heaven and placing his full attention once more on Israel—fulfilling promises long foretold.

Reclaiming the Heart of True Christianity

Christian Zionism’s legitimization of genocide and its endorsement of occupation and violence in Gaza stand in stark contrast to the teachings at the very heart of true Christianity. Supporting the actions of Israel has led to the death and persecution of fellow Christians who live in Gaza. Israel is anti-Christian and denies Jesus Christ as the Son of God. 

Throughout the Gospels, Jesus never calls for violence; instead, He embodies compassion, forgiveness, and radical love for one’s neighbor—even one’s enemy. When we examine Christ’s life and message, it becomes clear that any ideology promoting harm or oppression cannot claim His endorsement.

True Christianity is rooted in justice, mercy, and peace. It calls us to reject systems or beliefs that justify suffering or conflict in God’s name. Instead, followers of Jesus are invited to be peacemakers—those who break down walls rather than build them up. In a world where faith is sometimes misused to legitimize violence or occupation, let us return to Jesus’ example: loving unconditionally and standing with those who seek dignity and freedom.

But there is hope—and it begins with accountability. Imagine if every promise made by Western governments was matched by concrete action: if every dollar of aid or arms came with clear conditions protecting minorities; if diplomatic engagement prioritized not just stability but true equality under the law. We can be inspired by those who refuse to give up—by community leaders rebuilding against all odds—and join them in demanding more than rhetoric from our leaders.

The challenge before us is immense but not insurmountable. By bridging this gap between commitment and action, we can help ensure that Middle Eastern Christians are not forgotten—that they have a future filled with hope instead of fear. Let our generation be remembered as one that turned promises into protection—and words into lasting change.