Sunday, November 1, 2026

Why Has God Permitted This Presidency?

I have been asked some serious questions: Why is Donald Trump in office? What purpose does he fulfill in the plan of God? What judgment might his actions bring upon America?

These questions deserve more than a political slogan. They call for an open Bible, an honest heart, and enough humility to admit that we do not know everything God is doing.

I do not write as someone who has received a private revelation concerning this president. I write as a country preacher who believes that rulers are accountable to God, that the church must speak truth, and that our confidence belongs in Jesus Christ.

I cannot tell you every reason God has permitted this presidency. I can tell you that no presidency releases the church from obedience to the Lord.

Winning does not prove God’s approval

At the human level, presidents come into office through elections, institutions, and the choices of voters. Those choices involve responsibility. We cannot make political decisions and then escape accountability by saying, “It must have been God’s will.”

Daniel declared:

“And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings.” —Daniel 2:21, KJV

God remains sovereign over human history. But sovereignty does not mean approval of everything a ruler says or does. Scripture records rulers who possessed authority while practicing conduct God condemned.

Hosea records this accusation against Israel:

“They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not.” —Hosea 8:4, KJV

These passages come from different circumstances, but together they caution us against a careless conclusion. A ruler’s possession of power does not establish the righteousness of his conduct.

Winning an election does not make a man holy. Political success cannot turn dishonesty into truth or vulgarity into virtue.

That standard applies to every president.

We must not pretend to know God’s secret counsel

Some Christians are quick to identify a favored politician as a modern Cyrus. Others are equally certain that a president they oppose must be Pharaoh or the Antichrist.

I believe we should exercise much greater care.

“The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.” —Deuteronomy 29:29, KJV

God has revealed enough for us to obey Him. He has not revealed every purpose behind every political event.

In Scripture, God used rulers to preserve life, restrain enemies, expose evil, and execute judgment. But the biblical text identifies those purposes. We do not possess the same authority to assign a prophetic identity to a modern president.

A comparison may illustrate a principle. It must not become a substitute for revelation.

I would rather confess that I do not know God’s entire purpose than speak confidently where He has not spoken.

Being used by God does not excuse wrongdoing

Even when God uses a ruler, that ruler remains morally accountable.

Isaiah 10 describes Assyria as an instrument of judgment. Yet the same chapter announces judgment upon the Assyrian king because of his pride:

“I will punish the fruit of the stout heart of the king of Assyria, and the glory of his high looks.” —Isaiah 10:12, KJV

The lesson is sobering. Serving a purpose within God’s providence does not give a ruler permission to practice arrogance, cruelty, or injustice.

We should remember that whenever someone says, “God is using him,” as though that ends every moral question.

God’s ability to work through human events never makes repentance unnecessary.

What this presidency may be revealing

Here is my opinion, offered as an interpretation rather than a prophecy: this presidency has become an occasion for exposing the loyalties of the American church.

It raises questions we cannot answer honestly with campaign slogans.

Do we believe character matters only when the president belongs to the opposing party? Do we condemn vulgarity in one man while laughing at it in another? Do we insist upon truth until a falsehood serves our political interests?

I remember the moral arguments made during Bill Clinton’s presidency. Many evangelical voices insisted that conduct mattered and that the example of a president influenced the nation’s children.

I believed character mattered then. I believe it matters now.

If Christians condemn misconduct in Clinton while excusing vulgarity in Trump, the inconsistency deserves examination. The issue is whether Scripture governs our judgment when applying it becomes politically inconvenient.

“My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.” —James 2:1, KJV

This does not describe every evangelical or every Trump voter. A ballot does not reveal every motive of the person who casts it. But wherever Christians defend wrongdoing because it benefits their side, the church’s witness suffers.

God can use that exposure to call us to repentance. We must decide whether we will receive the correction.

Judgment can begin with what we choose

When people ask what judgment America will suffer, they often imagine a sudden catastrophe.

I will not claim that a particular storm, disease, economic collapse, or military defeat is God’s punishment for this president. Scripture does not authorize me to make that prediction.

Jesus challenged the assumption that victims of tragedy were worse sinners than other people. He turned His hearers toward their own need for repentance:

“I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.” —Luke 13:3, KJV

That should restrain our willingness to explain someone else’s suffering as a divine sentence.

Nevertheless, wrongdoing has consequences.

“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” —Galatians 6:7, KJV

Paul addresses moral choices and their consequences. We should take that warning seriously in our personal lives and in the public conduct we encourage.

A society that rewards dishonesty weakens its ability to trust. A society that celebrates humiliation teaches its children to despise. A society that excuses corruption makes justice harder to obtain. Decisions that disregard human life bring grief into real homes.

These consequences may unfold through ordinary human decisions. They are reason enough to resist wrongdoing before its harvest arrives.

Romans 1 also describes God giving people over to desires they persistently embrace. That chapter does not name America or predict this presidency. But it warns us that judgment can involve being permitted to follow a destructive course we refuse to abandon.

We ought to tremble at the possibility that getting everything we demand could expose how badly we have chosen.

The president is not the only one accountable

A president bears responsibility for the authority he exercises. Advisers, lawmakers, religious leaders, and citizens bear responsibility for their own actions.

Those responsibilities are not identical. Neither can they all be transferred to one man.

If a pastor knowingly excuses wrongdoing, that pastor must answer for the excuse. If a citizen repeats a claim known to be false, the citizen bears responsibility for repeating it. If we applaud cruelty, we must examine our own pleasure in it.

The church cannot surrender its conscience to a political leader and later claim it had no choice.

“We ought to obey God rather than men.” —Acts 5:29, KJV

That confession has meaning when obeying God costs us something.

God’s concern for the vulnerable has not changed

Psalm 82 declares:

“Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked.” —Psalm 82:3–4, KJV

Whatever conclusions we reach about the beings addressed in that psalm, God’s concern for justice is unmistakable.

Political power must not make us indifferent to suffering. The poor, the stranger, the child, and the civilian caught in war remain human beings whose lives matter before God.

As a Friends pastor, I cannot put away the teaching of Jesus whenever national anger rises.

“But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.” —Matthew 5:44, KJV

Loving our country does not cancel that command. Supporting a government does not remove our obligation to speak when its actions violate the principles we profess.

Judgment begins at the house of God

Before the church announces judgment upon everyone outside its doors, it should hear Peter:

“For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God.” —1 Peter 4:17, KJV

Peter writes in the context of Christian suffering and God’s judgment. His words should sober us and direct us toward faithfulness.

Have we made national power more precious than Christian obedience? Have we become more eager to defend a president than to tell the truth? Have we allowed political enemies to become people whose suffering we enjoy?

Those questions belong before the Lord.

I must ask them of myself as well as others. There is no virtue in exposing another person’s pride while nourishing my own.

My prayer is for repentance

I do not want to see America destroyed. I do not want to see Donald Trump destroyed. I want him to repent of wrongdoing, receive wisdom, and govern justly. I want the same grace for every person in public office.

I want the church to recover its freedom to tell the truth.

We can pray for a president and hold him accountable. We can acknowledge a sound decision and rebuke shameful conduct. We can oppose injustice while praying for the salvation of those responsible.

Our task does not depend upon knowing every hidden purpose of God.

“He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?” —Micah 6:8, KJV

That is where this country preacher must stand.

Whatever purpose God permits this presidency to serve, my duty is to remain faithful to Jesus Christ. The church must never become so committed to defending a ruler that it forgets to obey its Lord.


When Nationalism Takes the Place of Christian Values

 

There is a troubling question the American church needs to answer: Why did so many evangelical voices insist that character mattered during Bill Clinton’s presidency, yet excuse or celebrate vulgarity when it comes from Donald Trump?

The question is not whether Clinton’s misconduct should have been condemned. It should have been. The question is why the same moral standard is not consistently applied to a leader whom those Christians support.

When the standard changes according to political allegiance, something has displaced the authority of Scripture.

James wrote:

“My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.” —James 2:1, KJV

We cannot faithfully preach one standard for our opponents and another for our allies. A Republican victory cannot make vulgarity wholesome. A Democratic failure cannot make dishonesty acceptable. God’s commandments do not change when the White House changes hands.

This does not describe every evangelical Christian. Many have resisted this double standard. But wherever Christians defend conduct they once condemned because the offender now serves their political interests, the church needs to honestly examine its loyalties.

Love of country can be honorable. We should care about our neighbors, pray for our leaders, and work for the good of our communities. Nationalism becomes a spiritual danger when the nation’s power, prestige, or political success becomes the highest good—and Christianity is enlisted to serve it.

At that point, the question quietly changes. Instead of asking, “Does this honor Jesus Christ?” people ask, “Will this help our side win?”

That shift shows how Christian values can be pushed aside without anyone announcing they have abandoned them. The Bible remains on the pulpit, but political loyalty begins deciding which passages to apply and which offenses to overlook.

Jesus said:

“My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight.” —John 18:36, KJV

Christ’s kingdom does not depend upon the dominance of an American political party. Its King has never needed His followers to excuse sin to preserve His throne.

Fear helps make this exchange possible. Christians are told that their country is being taken away, their faith will disappear, and only a powerful leader can protect them. Once that fear takes hold, almost any compromise can seem necessary.

Cruelty becomes toughness. Humiliation becomes courage. Vulgarity becomes plain speaking. Accountability becomes betrayal.

But Scripture says:

“For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.” —2 Timothy 1:7, KJV

We should be especially careful when someone asks us to sacrifice Christian obedience in exchange for political protection. The promise of protection does not give a leader ownership of the Christian conscience.

Some will say, “We elected a president, not a pastor.” Certainly, public office and pastoral ministry are different callings. Christians may face difficult electoral choices, and voting for a candidate does not necessarily mean approving everything that candidate does.

But a vote does not require applause for wrongdoing.

A Christian can support a policy and rebuke the president who advances it. A Christian can acknowledge a political accomplishment and still call degrading speech shameful. When supporters lose that freedom, their loyalty has become spiritually dangerous.

Paul wrote:

“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying.” —Ephesians 4:29, KJV

That teaching makes no exception for a politician who promises to appoint favorable judges, secure borders, or defend religious liberty.

The Clinton–Trump comparison exposes the problem. If character was essential when judging Clinton, Christians must explain why it becomes secondary when judging Trump. Otherwise, the public has reason to question whether the original concern was righteousness or partisan advantage.

Our children notice these contradictions. They hear us teach respect for women, then watch how we respond when a favored leader speaks about a woman in a degrading way. They hear us condemn lying, then listen as we manufacture excuses for someone on our own side.

What lesson are they learning? That Christian morality binds everyone equally—or that powerful friends receive exemptions?

Nationalism also narrows our understanding of whom we must love. The gospel commands us to love our neighbors and our enemies. Political tribalism pressures us to reserve compassion for people in our group.

Yet Jesus said:

“Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you.” —Matthew 5:44, KJV

A nation may distinguish citizens from noncitizens for government purposes. The church must still recognize the humanity and God-given worth of every person. National interest cannot erase our obligation to truth, mercy, and justice.

We must apply that same discipline when criticizing political Christians. We cannot expose contempt by practicing contempt ourselves. We should challenge their reasoning, name the double standard, and call them to repentance without pretending we know every voter’s heart.

The purpose is to recover a faithful witness.

Peter declared:

“We ought to obey God rather than men.” —Acts 5:29, KJV

That confession must remain true when obeying God costs us influence with our preferred party.

As a country preacher, I believe the church needs to recover the courage to tell its political friends the truth. Condemning the opposition requires little courage. Rebuking someone who offers us power, access, and protection tests whom we actually serve.

We may love America, but America is not our Savior. We may participate in elections, but an election cannot establish righteousness in the human heart. We may appreciate a president’s decisions, but no president deserves our unconditional devotion.

When national victory becomes more important than obedience to Jesus, nationalism takes the place that belongs to Christ.

The church’s calling remains:

“He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?” —Micah 6:8, KJV