Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Seeking World Domination With A Flawed Policy

 On Memorial Day, I was reminded of the number of men and women who have given their all for the political posturing of those in power.  The number of lives lost in Vietnam fighting for so called democracy was no more than the protection of the U.S. international agenda of world control.  U.S. motives in the Vietnam War, were irrational since the U.S. had no explicit interests in Vietnam. The Vietnamese were not going to attack America, nor were the Russians or Chinese.   

In 1950 the Executive Secretary to the National Security Council on United States Objectives and Programs for National Security gave a report to President Truman on April 14, 1950, that became the guiding agenda for U.S. foreign policy.  This was in response to the Soviet acquisition of nuclear weapons.  The U.S. policy makers felt that the U.S. government should be ready to support states that were threatened by the USSR, particularly states in Europe and within the vicinity of Japan.  The policy was to be prepared to encounter both the USSR and Chinese aggression. The U.S. foreign policy during the 1950’s to the early 1970’s, including the U.S. involvement and presence in the Far East has been guided by NSC 68’s Report.  This report became a flawed policy the was the result of the misconception of both the Soviet and Chinese threats to the United States.

It was a known fact among the U.S. government leaders that the Vietnam War was not going to be won.  In 1965, McNaughton, McNamara’s Assistant Secretary for International Security Affairs, listed the American foreign policy toward Vietnam as follows: 70%- to avoid a humiliating defeat. 20%- to keep South Vietnam territory from the Chinese. 10%- to permit the people of South Vietnam to enjoy a better, freer way of life.  Does this sound like the American soldier was a priority in the Vietnam War?

NSC 68 Report has had a major impact on the foreign policy and continues to this day.  Both Russia and China are portrayed as the evil empires that are out to destroy freedom in America.  It is the responsibility of the U.S. government to make sure that aggression from both Russia and China are stopped.  A policy written in 1950 is still being used by those who need to continue a foreign policy that puts American soldiers at risk for the political agenda of those seeking world domination.  When has either Russia or China put military bases on our borders? When have Russia or China threatened America with invasion?

Relations between Russia and NATO have been tense since the alliance accused Russia of getting involved in the Ukrainian conflict, a claim Russia has continuously denied. By the way, why are we in the Ukraine?

Following Crimea's reunification with Russia in March, the U.S. and Europe bombarded Russia with sanctions and NATO significantly increased its military presence near Russia's borders, especially in Poland and the former Soviet Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. Who is the aggressor?
It was Hillary Clinton who, as Secretary of State in 2010, elevated the competing territorial claims for rocks and reef in the South China Sea to an international issue; CNN and BBC hysteria followed; China was building airstrips on the disputed islands. In its mammoth war game in 2015, Operation Talisman Sabre, the U.S. practiced “choking” the Straits of Malacca through which pass most of China’s oil and trade. 

Clinton declared that America had a “national interest” in these Asian waters. The Philippines and Vietnam were encouraged and bribed to pursue their claims and old enmities against China. In America, people are being primed to see any Chinese defensive position as offensive, and so the ground is laid for rapid escalation. A similar strategy of provocation and propaganda is applied to Russia.  It is amazing that Russia is going in a direction of giving more freedom to the Russian people and the U.S. government is taking away our freedoms.

Clinton, the “women’s candidate”, leaves a trail of bloody coups: in Honduras, in Libya (plus the murder of the Libyan president) and Ukraine. The latter is now a CIA theme park swarming with Nazis and the frontline of a beckoning war with Russia. It was through Ukraine – literally, borderland - that Hitler’s Nazis invaded the Soviet Union, which lost 27 million people. This epic catastrophe remains a presence in Russia. Clinton’s presidential campaign has received money from all but one of the world’s ten biggest arms companies. No other candidate comes close.  If she is elected, we will put more of our young men and women in harm’s way. 

Sanders, the hope of many young Americans, is not very different from Clinton in his territorial view of the world beyond the United States. He backed Bill Clinton’s illegal bombing of Serbia. He supports Obama’s terrorism by drone, the provocation of Russia and the return of special forces (death squads) to Iraq. He has nothing to say on the drumbeat of threats to China and the accelerating risk of nuclear war. He agrees that Edward Snowden should stand trial and he calls Hugo Chavez – like him, a social democrat. He promises to support Clinton if she is nominated.  He is no different than Clinton.

The election of Trump or Clinton is the old illusion of choice that is no choice: two sides of the same coin. The choice of the lesser of two evils still gives us evil as the final choice.

Here are the questions Americans should be asking our presidential candidates: Why is the United States “everywhere on the globe”? What is NATO’s true mission? Why does the US always pursue regime change in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine? Why does Washington treat Russia and Vladimir Putin as an enemy?  Why are we forcing a confrontation with Russia and China when the loss could never justify the deaths of our young men and women.

Will history show that the policy of the 1950’s cost America the lives of many of our youth because some politician followed and outdated policy that has been a failure from the beginning, based on a flawed assumption that the U.S. government has the responsibility to protect the entire world from Russia and China? 

It would be a blessing if the present wars ended and there were no more names added to those who gave all.  I believe in a strong military.  I believe in the right to defend our nation with whatever means needed.  I do not believe in sending our military to countries that hate us, want to destroy our way of life, or show us disrespect. I do not want to see our soldiers sacrifice their lives for the political agenda of a group of evil politicians who are obsessed with world domination.

The only way to stop evil is for our Nation to seek the wisdom of the LORD, confess our sins and turn from the wicked ways that have become so common in our country.  America has lost its greatness because we are led by evil leaders who have disregarded the commandments of the LORD.

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

Stealing The Wealth of the World

 Almost every week I receive “preapproved” mortgage loans, credit cards, invitations to change banks and investment opportunities that will make me wealthy in a matter of months.  I understand that there is a conspiracy to control my money.  Yes, I know I may sound like a “conspiracy theory” nut but the reality is there is a conspiracy to control the money of the working class people.  It has been going on since evil men designed a way to rob people of their wealth.  There was a system devised that changed gold for paper.  This system is still used today to create wealth for the money manipulators by printing worthless paper money.  The problem is that this practice is so common that no one wants to challenge the system and very few individuals will even question the practice.
What is frustrating is that as a middle-class, working person I have no real control over my money.  I am at the mercy of the present banking system.  So if you have time let me give you a short history lesson with the intent of getting you angry and upset.
One of the aspects of banking that most people know little to nothing about is the fractional reserve system.  This is the standard banking practice where the bank can issue more money than it actual holds in reserve.  Did you know that for every dollar you have in your checking or savings account, the bank can legally loan out ten dollars or more?  Is it any wonder that the bank wants you to start a checking and savings account and can offer you money and gifts to open that new account?  Every dollar has the potential of becoming ten dollars or more.-
The public education system has a poor track record of teaching economics to our children.  Colleges and universities have just as poor of a record, although they may touch on the history of the present day banking practices without exposing the corruption.
Here's a description of fraction reserve banking's origins from a standard university macroeconomics text [1]:
"When the ancients began to use gold in making transactions, it became apparent that it was both unsafe and inconvenient for consumers and merchants to carry gold and have it weighed and assessed for purity every time a transaction was negotiated. It, therefore, became commonplace to deposit one's gold with goldsmiths whose vaults or strong rooms could be used for a fee. Upon receiving a gold deposit, the goldsmith issued a receipt to the depositor. Soon goods were traded for the goldsmiths' receipts and the receipts became the first kind of paper money.
"At this point the goldsmiths – embryonic bankers – used a 100% reserve system; their circulating paper money receipts were fully backed by gold. But, given the public's acceptance of the goldsmiths' receipts as paper money, the goldsmiths became aware that the gold they stored was rarely redeemed. Then some adroit banker hit on the idea that paper money could be issued in excess of the amount of gold held. Goldsmiths [then began to issue] additional 'receipts' ... into circulation by making interest-earning loans in the form of gold receipts. This was the beginning of the fractional reserve system of banking."
The college text from which the above quote is taken does not question the propriety of goldsmiths creating these new "receipts" or money without any gold backing, without any authority, and indeed without any real reason to do so other than to enrich themselves. In fact, the text even praises the questionable behavior of the one who began this hidden form of corruption as "adroit."
The unsuspecting public had no idea that goldsmiths were issuing paper receipts accepted as money which was backed by no gold deposits at all for ten times or more the amount of gold that had been entrusted to them. The goldsmiths were secretly creating money out of thin air. They thus made themselves fantastically wealthy without anyone noticing what was going on. To better hide this deceit and divert people's attention, the goldsmiths stopped their old practice of charging for storing gold and instead began to pay customers a small interest on their gold deposits to keep them happy. Thus, it was that modern day bankers were born.
Amazingly, the system has changed little today. Macroeconomics professors, college texts, and all involved with banking almost never question the ethics or morality of this fractional reserve system. No one even questions in any meaningful way the ethics and corruption involved in creating money out of thin air. In fact, the fractional reserve system was formalized into law centuries ago and continues to be both legal and the accepted common practice around the world today.
Have you ever wondered how banks afford those massive buildings downtown if they charge only 10% or so on loans and pay 5% or less interest on deposits? If bankers were not allowed to create money out of thin air, they would be making only a few percent a year on every loan issued, far from enough to build the towering skyscrapers owned by banks in practically every major city. But by creating credit (money) using the fractional reserve system, bankers can legally claim credit to 10 times or more the amount of any loan. Now you can understand the foundation upon which global banking empires are built.
I know you are saying that it does not hurt me.  I put my money in the bank and have the convenience of using a debit card, writing a check or have a savings account that is insured.  So what is the problem is the banks loan out more money than they actual have in reserves?  The problem is the money created from thin air inflates the money that is earned by hard working people.  Your dollar is worth less. In fact, it will eventually become worthless.  This practice only serves to allow the banking system to continue to wield excessively powerful and corrupt influence on business, industry and government.
Keep this in mind, the entire source of power those who control the economics of the world is their ability to hide from the general public the corrupt system they have put in place to control the wealth of the world. 
Yes, I do believe that there exists an "elite group of manipulators" at the top of banking and industry, operating through government and the media, and controlling our political, social and personal lives to ever-increasing degrees.
This elite group has been pursuing its ambitions for centuries and is operating an agenda entirely not in our interest. It has ruthlessly manipulated the political landscape via the strategic destabilization and reorganization of nation states; and its ultimate objective is to take the citizens of the world and slowly mold them into a single, homogenized trading and consuming block under their centralized control.
If this sounds like some apocalyptic conspiracy theory to have world domination you are right.  It is no more than the fulfillment of prophecy. The ultimate goal of this elite group is to bring about a single global marketplace, controlled by a world government, policed by a world army, financially regulated by a world bank via a single global currency.  The sad part of all this is that there is nothing we can do to stop them.  It has been prophesied as far back as Biblical prophets that this would take place.
Today, there are those who are pushing Americans to invest in gold and re-establishing a gold standard.  From the lessons of history, we should understand the bankers will not go quietly.  The power of the Federal Reserve bankers will never surrender without a fight.  Only the rich will be able to invest in gold and with 16 million unemployed and who really knows the true number we must prepare for more chaos and anarchy.  Our hope is not in gold and silver our hope is in Truth and that truth is founded on  Biblical principals.
 The economic problems of the world or even our country will be hard pressed to solve the economic  problem by promises of hope and change.  The whole attitude of entitlement has created an atmosphere of envy, greed and discontentment among those who have become dependent upon the government to meet their basic needs of food, clothing and housing.  This same discontentment is starting to grow among those who have lost their jobs, homes and ability to provide for the basics needs of their family.  When there are no more unemployment benefits left, there will be more riots and chaos.  Americans will grow weary of all of this and like France accept a leader who may solve our financial woes at the cost of our freedom. 
What concerns me is there will be those who accept the games both political parties have worked on the American people for years. They gain our confidence and steal our wealth.  Every four years we hear the same lies from the frauds and thieves that have only one purpose in mind—reduce the American people to the status of poor and gain their own personal wealth.  They bailout the rich, oppress the poor and steal from the working class all under the guise of taking care of us.  The American people have listened to the Serpents of Monetary control and we have lost the Independence of -- We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Remember this, your freedom is tied directly to your wealth.  Who controls your wealth controls your freedom.